Hard numbers: restricting Afghan women costs economy, world’s most expensive city, Michigan school shooting, Ugandan troops in DRC


The ruling legalized abortion nationwide up to fetal viability – which is now around 23 weeks pregnant – on the grounds that women enjoy a constitutional right to privacy.

The first indications on Wednesday were that the Tory-dominated tribunal would follow Mississippi law, but we will not know if a majority will move to explicitly overthrow Deer vs. Wade until a final decision is made next summer.

Yes Roe deer is invalidated, nearly half of US states would immediately ban most abortions. The passions are, as always, run high.

Why is this problem so intense in the United States?

Seen from abroad, the abortion battles in the United States can sometimes seem strange. While other countries have struggled with the issue, the ferocity and violence surrounding the issue in the United States stands out.

One of the main reasons is that in addition to discussing abortion itself, Americans often discuss the how the matter was decided.

Opponents of abortion often argue that a moral issue like this should be left to elected state legislatures, which better reflect the preferences of their constituents than unelected Supreme Court justices in distant Washington, DC.

Proponents of choice, meanwhile, say that such a fundamental problem is precisely one in which universal rights must be identified and then upheld by the highest court in the land. If we had left Jim Crow to the local legislatures, they point out, this injustice could have persisted for decades more.

This standoff between state rights and national prerogatives has defined America from the earliest days. He once plunged the country into war. And it’s still an electrical problem in the United States on everything from health care, to firearms, to right to vote, the vaccination orders. Abortion is no exception.

A problem with Roe versus Wade. Even some proponents of the right to abortion see flaws in Deer vs. Wade which left him open to attack.

The late liberal judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for example, felt that the court may have gone too quickly, making a radical decision before a large majority of citizens and states rally to it. She also argued that by focusing on privacy rather than the more universal concept of gender equality, the Supreme Court had left abortion on legally more fragile ground.

When the Court enshrined a constitutional right to same-sex marriage in 2015, by contrast, it was already behind the popular curve – 30 states had already done so. At the time of Deer, only 20 states had legalized abortion.

Other countries have treated it differently, put the legislatures or popular referendums in the driving seat.

Majority Catholic Italy, for example, legalized abortion in the late 1970s a law supported by two referendums. Ireland also took the plunge in 2018 by Referendum, while Argentina did so last year a legislative process.

Not everyone in these countries agrees with these measures, but advocates of the right to choose can still invoke democratic and legislative legitimacy in a way more difficult to do in the United States.

So what to do Do Americans Really Think About Abortion Today? On 60 percent say it should be legal in most or all cases, according to a recent Pew poll.

But there is a caveat: a recent AP / NORC poll show that while 61% of Americans support this right in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, that number drops by thirty points when it comes to the second trimester. Mississippi law only applies two weeks after the start of the second trimester.

What happens next? The view of this court on Roe deer will not be released until next summer, that is to say only 2 to 3 months before the midterm elections. Whichever direction you take, the decision will be (another) cultural war bomb ahead of this vote.


Comments are closed.